The second essay is clearly superior. Historians have to sift through numerous possibilities and decide what's most important. The second essay prioritizes a cause and deprioritizes another... while providing a cohesive narrative. The first essay is a list of possibilities with no judgment. For a moment I thought it was a compilation of three different responses.
The second essay is clearly superior. Historians have to sift through numerous possibilities and decide what's most important. The second essay prioritizes a cause and deprioritizes another... while providing a cohesive narrative. The first essay is a list of possibilities with no judgment. For a moment I thought it was a compilation of three different responses.